20 February 2020
Patient demand presents a significant challenge to the healthcare system.1 In fact, nearly 40% of hospitals report unsafe patient volumes monthly.1 Factors such as insufficient capacity, inadequate monitoring, and disorganized transfers impact hospital overcrowding and reduce efficiency.2
Furthermore, high patient volume is dangerous and can lead to increased patient harm, including healthcare-associated infections, increased length of stay and higher rates of readmission.1 Integrating connected care technologies can help improve throughput, providing benefits for patients and hospital systems.
Throughput issues often begin in the emergency department (ED) where overcrowding is linked to poor patient outcomes.2 This is a result of clinically significant delays and decreased recognition of deterioration—both factors that can increase patient length of stay.3 While the causes of ED overcrowding are complex, high volume of critically ill patients, insufficient capacity and high patient-to-nurse ratios all contribute to low patient flow.3
Inefficient communication, both in and out of the ED, can have additional repercussions to patient flow. Up to 80% of serious medical errors involve miscommunication between medical providers at patient hand-off.4 Moreover, inefficient communication can lead to loss of valuable time in arranging consults and transfers, potentially delaying patient treatment and discharge. These interruptions in patient care also contribute to high patient population and increase risk of complications.2, 5, 6
Low patient throughput can also be related to inadequate monitoring. High patient load can inhibit early detection of patient deterioration and patient injuries, which may contribute to patient complications. In the Med-Surg environment, falls, pressure injuries and hospital-acquired infections are common complications that may be reduced with improved monitorinig.7–11 Once these complications arise, however, patients may need to stay in the hospital longer, which may inherently contribute to patient throughput.
Improving patient throughput in your organization is an integrated effort that requires collaboration at every step of the patient experience, from admission to discharge.12 Introducing technology, clear clinical protocols and a multidisciplinary workflow can help improve throughput while maintaining high quality of care and minimizing adverse outcomes.7, 13
The integration of technology can create a connected care model that saves valuable time to help improve patient throughput.14–17 When weighing the costs, switching to a connected care system may seem high, but investing in patient throughput optimization can provide real benefits to both patients and healthcare organizations.1, 5, 12
Check out the case studies below to learn how various healthcare organizations improved their throughput.
At NCH North Naples Hospital in Naples, FLA, automatic transmission of vital sign data into the EHR led to16:
Continuous monitoring in an inpatient 33-bed Med-Surg unit led to14:
When Avera Health in Sioux Falls, SD, integrated a mobile communications platform into the EHR to improve discharge time18:
Further, NaviCare® Nurse Call helps anticipate care to improve satisfaction19–21:
High patient census is often associated with poor patient outcomes and high hospital cost.1 By integrating technologies, patient throughput can be improved allowing hospitals to treat a larger volume of patients with the same quality of care. As a result, patients may experience fewer complications resulting from prolonged hospital stay. Connected care technology can reduce errors, enhance collaboration and increase efficiency resulting in increased value to patients and hospital systems.
1. Litvak E, Fineberg H. Smoothing the way to high quality, safety, and economy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1581-1853.
2. Litvak E. What Is Patient Flow? NEJM Catalyst. Available at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/CAT.18.0289. Published 2018. Accessed February 5, 2020.
3. Cowan RM, Trzeciak S. Clinical review: Emergency department overcrowding and the potential impact on the critically ill. Crit Care. 2005;9(3):291-295.
4. Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare releases targeted solutions tool for hand-off communications. Jt Comm Perspect. 2012;32(8):1-3.
5. Reddy AJ, Pappas R, Suri S, Whinney C, Yerian L, Guzman JA. Impact of throughput optimization on intensive care unit occupancy. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30(4):317-322.
6. Rosman M, Rachminov O, Segal O, Segal G. Prolonged patients’ in-hospital waiting period after discharge eligibility is associated with increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality: A retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1-5.
7. Targeted Solutions Tool® (TST®) Preventing falls. Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-69
8. Centers for Disease Control. Hospital-associated infecton data portal. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/portal/index.html. Accessed February 5, 2020.
9. American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals. Hospital Statistics, 1976, 1981, 1991–2011 editions. Chicago, IL. (Copyright 1976, 1981, 1991–2011. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2011/116.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2020.
10. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care-associated infections: A meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-2046.
11. Berlowitz D. Prevention of pressure-induced skin and soft tissue injury. UpTodate. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/prevention-of-pressure-induced-skin-and-soft-tissue-injury. Published 2018. Accessed February 5, 2020.
12. Rutherford PA, Provost LP, Kotagal UR, Luther K, Anderson A. Achieving Hospital-wide Patient Flow. IHI White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2017. (Available at www.ihi.org)
13. Waters TM, Daniels MJ, Bazzoli GJ, et al. Effect of Medicare’s nonpayment for hospital-acquired conditions: Lessons for future policy. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(3):347-354.
14. Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, Bates DW, Zimlichman E. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: A controlled clinical trial. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):226-232.
15. Meccariello M, Perkins D, Quigley LG, Rocak A, Qui J. Vital time savings: Evaluating the use of an automated vital signs documentation system on a medical/surgical unit. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2010;24(4):46-51.
16. CareAware VitalsLink: Prepared by Cerner Corporation; 2013.
17. Fieler VK, Jaglowski T, Richards K. Eliminating errors in vital signs documentation. Comput Informatics Nurs. 2013;31(9):422-427.
18. Voalte Avera Health case study.
19. Hillrom Customer (Central). Nurse Call interview. 2016. Data on file.
20. Hillrom Customer (GC). Nurse Call Data Report. August 2015. Customer interview 2016. Data on File.
21. Hillrom 2019. Scotland Memorial Hospital improves safety and satisfaction with clinical communications platform solution 209858 rev 1. Data on file.